Expert oncology consultation for medical malpractice and product liability litigation.
Providing clear, objective oncology insight for attorneys, insurers, and manufacturers involved in complex medical litigation across the United States.

Expert Consultation
Board-certified in Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Dr. Stark draws on 34 years of clinical practice and ongoing teaching at Eastern Virginia Medical School and the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine to provide authoritative case review for attorneys, insurers, and manufacturers.
Explore expert consultationEvidence Review
The most common cause of cancer malpractice litigation is failure to diagnose promptly — a missed symptom, an unread imaging report, or an unaddressed lab value. Dr. Stark analyzes the significance of any such delay and whether it changed the patient's outcome.
Explore evidence reviewSubject Specializations
Focused oncology expertise across cancer diagnosis, screening, treatment complications, and standards-of-care issues in complex medical litigation matters.
Breast Cancer Issues
The most common reasons for breast cancer lawsuits are failure to interpret a mammogram properly and failure to evaluate a woman's complaint of a lump in her breast.
Colon Cancer Issues
Colon cancer is among the slowest-growing common adult tumors, with characteristics that make a missed diagnosis an ideal case for a plaintiff.
Lung Cancer Issues
The overall mortality of lung cancer is 90%. By the time a patient complains of coughing up blood or chest pain, it is almost always too late to effect a cure.
Chemotherapy Complications
Not every bad result associated with cancer chemotherapy is caused by negligent care. Mediports and similar devices have a simple structure, but one that can fail without warning.
Cancer Screening
From a litigation perspective, it has been clear since 2011 that failure to offer colorectal or breast cancer screening is negligent. The same cannot be said for much rarer syndromes.
News & Articles
View all →No articles yet.
Discuss a case or evidence review.
Reach out directly by phone or email — no intake forms, no gatekeeping.